ARC Raiders Embraces Player Feedback | 10+ Year plan promises massive PvE and PvP surprises

Recommended Article

• How to Complete Soul's Offering and Unlock All Event Rewards in ARC Raiders Live Update 2.3.0

  After more than a month, ARC Raiders has finally received a new Live Update - 2.3.0. This update not only introduces the brand-new Noxious Set but also brings several balance adjustments and bug fixes.

  Among them, the debut of the new player project Soul's Offering is undoubtedly the most noteworthy content of this update. Let's take a closer look at the new content and changes this update brings to players.

  Soul's Offering: A Limited-Time 20-Day Commemorative Project

  

  ARC Raiders also welcomes its own Halloween event - Soul's Offering. As the core of the narrative and gameplay of this update, this project went live on October 27th and will last until November 16th.

  The event revolves around the various contradas of Toledo. Despite differing opinions on surface casualties, they share a common grief over the loss of their comrades. To commemorate the Raiders who fell to the ARC offensive, residents from Ferrovia, Vaulto, and Murteta will build memorial shrines to remember their fallen comrades.

  The project is divided into four phases. In the first three phases, players need to collect and submit specific ARC Raiders items. The specific requirements and rewards for each phase are as follows:

  Phase 1: Construct Vaulto's Offering

  Required Materials:

  • Dead Flowers × 1
  • Rock Salt × 2
  • ARC Alloy × 15
  • Expired Respirator × 1

  Dead Flowers and Rock Salt are trinkets without fixed spawn points. It is recommended to prioritize searching drawers, cabinets, and other containers in residential areas. ARC Alloys can be obtained from ARC debris other than Ticks, while Expired Respirators are random loots; containers in residential areas are also worth searching.

  Completion Rewards: Stiletto II, Extended Barrel I, Angled Grip II, Stable Stock II.

  Phase 2: Construct Ferrovia's Offering

  Required Materials:

  • Dead Flowers × 3
  • Railway Lanterns × 2
  • Advanced ARC Powercell × 15
  • Remote Raider Flare × 10

  Note: One Dead Flowers was consumed in Stage One, so a total of four are needed for the first two stages. Continue collecting even after finding the first one.

  Railway Lanterns are also considered ticks; Advanced ARC Powercells can be obtained from larger ARCs, with the wreckage of Bombardier and Bastion being priority targets. Remote Raider Flare can be crafted at the Workstation or may appear as a random loot.

  Completion Rewards: Torrente II, Compensator III, Extended Medium Mag III, Stable Stock III.

  Phase 3: Construct Murteta's Offering

  The rarity of materials required in this phase increases significantly:

  • Fancy Plates × 2
  • Mask Fragment × 1
  • Insulation Roll × 1
  • Fertilizer × 5

  Fancy Plates are epic trinkets with no fixed spawn locations, making them difficult to obtain. Mask Fragments are also relatively rare; some players have reported finding them in Pendola Pass. Insulation Rolls can be obtained by searching random loot and Raider Caches, while the swampy areas of Dam Battlegrounds are a good place to search for Fertilizers.

  Completion Rewards: Vulcano I, Shotgun Silencer, Extended Shotgun Mag III, and Fireworks Box × 3.

  Important Note: These 3 Fireworks Boxes are key items for Phase Four; it is recommended to keep at least one for the final mission.

  Phase 4: Honor the Fallen

  The final task no longer requires additional material collection. Players simply need to carry at least one Fireworks Box, travel to Buried City, find the route to the rooftop of Santa Maria Houses, and set off fireworks at the designated location to complete the tribute ceremony.

  Upon completion, players will receive Pilgrim backpack and Offering Display Table Design.

  Emperor Loot Redistribution

  

  Emperor's loot redistribution is one of the most impactful changes in this update. After the update, containers near the entrance have a higher probability of producing low-tier rewards, while high-tier loot is more concentrated deeper inside.

  This change reduces the reward density of quickly clearing the entrance, allowing Raiders willing to venture deeper into the Emperor and take higher risks to receive commensurate rewards.

  Update 2.3.0 also expands the vulnerability prevention mechanisms for locked rooms inside the Emperor to improve fairness in these areas and limit the placement of Barricade Kits that overlap with entity boundaries or are crammed into overly narrow spaces.

  Blueprint Drop Rules Adjusted

  This update adjusts the blueprint drop rules for six weapons in ARC Raiders: blueprints for Dolabra, Bobcat, Equalizer, Jupiter, Tempest, and Volcano can now drop under any major map condition, no longer requiring specific conditions like Hurricane, Electromagnetic Storm, or Night Raid.

  However, the overall drop rate for these ARC Raiders blueprints has been slightly reduced to balance the increased acquisition opportunities. In other words, players no longer need to wait for specific map conditions, but whether the actual rewards are improved still depends on their play frequency and looting routes.

  The adjustments to Emperor Key blueprints are different. Their drop rate in Redirection Pods has been reduced, but these containers now have a small chance of producing ARC parts and high-tier ARC loot.

  Therefore, not all blueprint acquisition methods have become easier: Emperor Key blueprints are actually harder to obtain, while other potential rewards from Redirection Pods have increased.

  In addition, the 2.3.0 update also fixes a previous issue where the rarity and drop rate of furniture designs were inverted. After the adjustment, the actual drop rate matches the item's rarity.

  Equipment and Consumable Adjustments

  

  This update includes targeted adjustments to Heavy Shield, Flame Spray, and Firefly Burner, while also optimizing the usage mechanism of Adrenaline Shot.

  The base charge value of Heavy Shield has been increased from 80 to 90. The official statement indicates that the adjustment to the durability consumption rate of Frozen Trail has brought significant changes, but the overall usage rate of Heavy Shield remains low.

  Therefore, this update enhances its survivability by slightly increasing the base charge value, while avoiding further widening the gap between heavy and medium shields. For builds that rely on Heavy Shield, this change is expected to provide more stable protection in sustained firefights.

  Flame Spray's damage per second has been increased from 10 to 13, while its durability consumption has been reduced by 50%. The adjustments to both damage and usage cost further enhance its practicality in close-range suppression and area control.

  The Firefly Burner's trigger mechanism has also undergone a significant change. Previously, players needed to shoot the device to trigger its flame release; after the update, the device activates immediately upon impact, leaving a trail of flames as it moves, and explodes after approximately 3 seconds. This makes it more suitable for rapid deployment to block passageways, restrict enemy movement, or hinder enemy advances.

  Furthermore, Adrenaline Shot can now be used when stamina is full, but repeated use no longer stacks effects; instead, it refreshes the duration of the existing effect.

  Overall, ARC Raiders Live Update 2.3.0 not only brings limited-time missions and new rewards through Soul's Offering but also reworks loot distribution, blueprint acquisition methods, and the in-game performance of several items. Whether you want to complete events, collect rare blueprints, or optimize combat setups, this update offers noteworthy new changes.

• What Is the Fastest Way to Get Research Points in ARC Raiders?

  ARC Raiders Frozen Trail update introduces Amped Weapons, Level 5 Gunsmith, and Research Bench.

  Each Amped Weapon Mod requires 5,000 Research Points. There are several ways to earn Research Points, including collecting books and finding random loot during raids. Some farming methods are highly efficient, often yielding 1,000 to 2,000 Research Points in a single run.

  

  Research Point Items

  Following the update, 5 items can directly grant Research Points:

  • Battered Paperback: 50
  • Raider Logbook: 100
  • Exodus Technical Handbook: 150
  • ARC Data Module: 200
  • Frigate Diagnostic Node: 1,000

  ARC Data Modules and Frigate Diagnostic Nodes are your primary targets, as both appear frequently across the farming methods below. Alternatively, you can save time by choosing to buy ARC Raiders items that provide Research Points.

  ARC Frigate

  

  ARC Frigate event is one of the most popular ways to farm Research Points. All you need to do is enter a raid on a map with ARC Frigate condition. Board the ship and prioritize looting breachable gray containers. Focus on finding Frigate Diagnostic Nodes and ARC Data Modules, then extract safely. You can earn a substantial amount of Research Points in a single run.

  The key to farming ARC Frigates is managing your backpack space wisely. If you bring too much gear, you will have less room for loot, and you will lose everything you carry if you go down. Bring too little, however, and you may struggle to defend yourself around the containers when other Raiders or ARC enemies show up.

  When Vaporizer, Rocketeer, and Hydra enemies start shooting at you, you must handle them properly or risk missing your chance to open the containers. Whoever reaches a container first gets Data Module first. Whether you enter fully geared or with minimal equipment, the fundamental challenge is still a race to the lower deck.

  A recommended route is to approach from either the left or right wing and climb along the wing structure. Bring enough Adrenaline Shots to maintain your stamina while climbing. Most players head straight to the bottom to open Breachable Containers, so reaching the upper level first can often let you loot two or three containers uncontested.

  Along the way, you can take advantage of the wind to sprint past Hydras. Use an Adrenaline Shot to restore your stamina, then sprint around them. Afterward, activate Photoelectric Cloak and move toward the middle section on the right, where a container is usually guaranteed to spawn on the wall.

  Fallen Emperor

  

  The second method is to hunt for ARC Data Modules inside Fallen Emperor. First, you need a key called Emperor Gateway Conduit, which requires the following materials:

  • 1× ARC Insulated Coupler
  • 1× ARC Conductive Coupler
  • 1× ARC Plated Coupler

  Most importantly, you must also have Emperor Gateway Conduit blueprint. Without it, you cannot craft the key at Workbench, even if you have collected all the required materials.

  Once you have the key, enter the dungeon. Data Modules can be found throughout Fallen Emperor. They may spawn in any Breachable Container, explosive missile pod, or blue non-explosive pod, but the largest haul is consistently found in the final room.

  The final room is currently the best location in the game for obtaining large quantities of ARC Data Modules. Entering it triggers enemy activity and alarms. First, take cover behind a fallen container or in a recessed area to avoid being targeted by multiple flying ARC enemies.

  Next, shoot the 6 yellow nodes on the walls, with three on each side. Once all six are destroyed, the ceiling opens, potentially allowing enemies such as Wasps, Hornets, and Vaporizer units to enter.

  After destroying all the nodes, loot pods will emerge from the walls. Search these pods for high-value materials and ARC Data Modules.

  Pendola Pass Containers

  If you do not want to take on Fallen Emperor or ARC Frigate event, you can also earn Research Points by searching containers throughout Pendola Pass.

  The first priority is to loot Raider supply containers. These include Weapon Cases, Ammo Cases, Grenade Cases, Backpacks, and Medbags. When no cases are available, make sure to check Drawers as well.

  These containers have a high chance of yielding ARC Raiders blueprints and Research items, with loot quality ranging from gray to purple. They also offer relatively consistent results, especially on Pendola Pass. The map features both reliable container spawns and a high concentration of loot locations, making it the preferred map for this farming method.

  For primary points of interest, prioritize Commissary Supermarket, Railyard, and Cielo Sereno Observatory. If you spawn on the corresponding side of the map, focus your route around these areas. They typically contain multiple Raider container spawns and Drawers, making them excellent primary looting targets.

  Secondary points of interest include Dispatch Tower, Railroad Junction, and Deep Space Telescope. These locations also have a high density of Raider containers, making them worthwhile stops along your route.

  When planning your route for each raid, try to visit at least Supermarket or Railyard, as either location can yield more than 1,000 Research Points in a single run.

  Snow Shelters

  If you can reach Snow Shelters before other players, a single shelter may yield 500 to over 1,000 Research Points, along with other high-quality gear.

  Therefore, whenever a storm hits, keep an eye out for Snow Shelters. They can significantly increase your loot haul and even turn an otherwise unsuccessful raid around.

  Each of these three farming methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. If you are highly familiar with ARC Frigate event, you can earn around 1,500 Research Points per hour. Fallen Emperor takes time to prepare because crafting the key can be tedious, but it could be the most efficient method otherwise. Pendola Pass container farming, meanwhile, is less consistent. Ultimately, you can choose whichever method suits your playstyle best.

• How to Kill Turbine Fast in ARC Raiders after Update 2.2.0

  Regardless of how ARC Raiders develops through updates, ARC Turbine has firmly established itself as a high-value, unavoidable target in many matches.

  Previously, encountering a Turbine was largely a matter of luck; it only had a chance to spawn in certain sessions, forcing players to repeatedly enter the map just to get a shot at it.

  With the arrival of ARC Raiders Update 2.2.0, the spawn rate for Turbines has been significantly increased.

  In maps like Buried City, Riven Tides, Blue Gate, and Spaceport - where Turbine previously only had a chance to appear - it now shows up in the vast majority, if not all, of your matches.

  In other words, Turbine has shifted from an occasional encounter to a target that warrants proactive planning before you even engage.

  If you want to consistently take down a Turbine and secure its most prized loot - Turbine Compressor - you'll need to be strategic about your engagement range and the specific ARC Raiders items you bring into the fight.

  What makes Turbine a threat?

  The primary danger posed by Turbine is its Cluster Lightning Missiles. Once deployed and triggered, these create hazardous zones of electricity.

  If you remain stationary and continue firing at close range, you're highly likely to step on a mine - leading to an instant, fatal outcome.

  Therefore, your tactical focus in ARC Raiders should be clear: either use a Barricade Kit to completely block off the minefield and break Turbine's line of sight, or maintain enough distance to stay out of the lightning's reach.

  

  Close-Quarters Demolition

  When ARC Turbine is provoked and begins its assault, activate your Photoelectric Cloak to close the distance. Once inside the minefield, stay in a crouched position - crouching prevents the mines from detonating.

  Don't hesitate; identify a relatively flat patch of ground near Turbine and immediately deploy your Barricade Kit to create an enclosed, four-sided space around yourself.

  Once the enclosure is set, you can jump, roll, sprint, or strafe freely - actions that would otherwise trigger the surrounding mines.

  Within your barricade, these chain-reaction explosions won't harm you, nor will they allow the Turbine to lock onto your position.

  Next, remove one of the barriers - specifically one not facing Turbine - and observe the enemy's charging state.

  When a blue light ignites at its center and the unit begins to spin rapidly, it will soon slow down and deliver a heavy impact to the ground; this is the moment you've been waiting for.

  The unit will pause briefly (for up to about 15 seconds). Seize this opportunity to sprint forward, jump, and attach the two Deadline explosives you brought with you onto the base of the rotating, yellow, cylindrical core at the center of Turbine.

  Try to position the two Deadlines on opposite sides of the rotating cylinder.

  If both Deadlines are placed correctly, Turbine will explode and disintegrate shortly after it takes off.

  Once you have mastered this procedure in ARC Raiders, the time from placing the first Deadline to successfully destroying Turbine can be reduced to approximately 17 seconds.

  However, be aware that if both Deadlines are attached to the same side of the cylinder base, Turbine may not disintegrate, requiring a third Deadline to finish the job.

  If Turbine survives and manages to take flight, immediately retreat back into your deployed Barricade Kit and replace the fourth wall to restore the enclosed space; this will keep you safe from the lightning strikes.

  You can retrieve your Barricade Kit and most of your other gear; the only resources consumed are Deadlines.

  

  Ranged Combat

  If you prefer to avoid close-quarters combat, you can use a Jupiter or Amplified Jupiter to attack the aforementioned critical cylindrical structure of Turbine from a distance.

  What is the ideal range - safe yet efficient? Staying beyond 150 meters keeps you out of reach of the lightning, while remaining within 170 meters ensures that Jupiter's damage does not fall off.

  Once you are within this range, wait for Turbine to land and stabilize, then aim for those yellow cylinders and fire without hesitation.

  By patiently maintaining a distance of 150 to 170 meters and consistently landing shots on Turbine's weak points, you can take it down with approximately 36 rounds.

  Of course, if you prefer close-quarters combat, you could use Hullcracker, or employ a Snap Hook to reach the top of Turbine and attack it from there.

  But the question is: Are you prepared to take the risk of being instantly wiped out by either of these approaches?

  All things considered, we recommend a more controlled, long-range strategy for taking down Turbine.

  

  Hybrid Strategy

  Some clever players have come up with a way to combine Deadline and Jupiter strategies to ensure Turbine is destroyed quickly.

  Essentially, you carry a few Deadline charges, along with a Jupiter as a backup; if Turbine doesn't explode and fall apart from Deadline hits, you can simply follow up with a few shots from Jupiter.

  Two Deadline charges are usually enough to leave Turbine on the brink of destruction, allowing you to finish it off in no time - all that remains is to figure out how best to utilize ARC Raiders Turbine Compressor.

  With these strategies - and the improvements brought by ARC Raiders Update 2.2.0 - Turbine will no longer be a problem for you!

• ARC Raiders vs MW4 DMZ: Did the PvE Test Ending or New Competition Trigger the Player Drop?

  ARC Raiders has experienced a sharp decline in its Steam daily peak player count, and the timing has sparked a debate across the extraction shooter community. Did players leave because developer ended its temporary PvE matchmaking test, or did Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 DMZ arrive at exactly the right moment to steal their attention?

  The controversy intensified after a social media post claimed that ARC Raiders had dropped from approximately 159,000 peak concurrent players on Sunday, October 18, to just 69,000 by Thursday, October 22.

  However, the available Steam historical figures tell a somewhat different story. ARC Raiders recorded approximately 159,445 peak concurrent players on October 18 and 85,438 on October 22, representing a decline of roughly 46.4%. The daily peak then recovered slightly to 90,644 on October 23.

  Two major events overlapped with this decline: ARC Raiders concluded its weeklong PvE experiment on October 20, while Modern Warfare 4 DMZ entered Early Access that same day.

  Both developments may have influenced player activity, but neither has been proven to be the primary cause.

  The situation is particularly interesting because ARC Raiders had recently experienced renewed activity surrounding its Frozen Trail update and PvE testing period. Understanding what happened requires looking beyond a few days of Steam statistics.

  

  How Much Did ARC Raiders' Steam Player Count Actually Drop?

  The most useful starting point is the game's recent Steam activity rather than the viral claim alone.

  Historical Steam tracking data shows that ARC Raiders' daily peak declined significantly between October 18 and October 22, although it did not fall as far as the social media post suggested.

  ARC Raiders Steam daily peak concurrent players, October 18–23, 2026

  Date	Daily Peak	Daily Change
  Oct. 18 (Sunday)	159,445	—
  Oct. 19 (Monday)	125,761	-21.1%
  Oct. 20 (Tuesday)	99,727	-20.7%
  Oct. 21 (Wednesday)	86,649	-13.1%
  Oct. 22 (Thursday)	85,438	-1.4%
  Oct. 23 (Friday)	90,644	+6.1%

  Historical figures from Steam player tracking. Minor differences may occur between tracking services because of sampling intervals and reporting methods.

  The numbers reveal something the original social media discussion overlooked: ARC Raiders was already losing daily peak concurrency before MW4 DMZ entered Early Access on October 20.

  The decline began between Sunday and Monday, when the game's peak dropped by more than 33,000 players. Another substantial decline followed on Tuesday.

  By Thursday, the daily peak was approximately 74,000 players below Sunday's level, not 90,000. Friday then brought a modest recovery.

  This timeline weakens the argument that MW4 DMZ alone caused the decline.

  It also raises another question: Was ARC Raiders returning to a more typical activity level after an unusually busy period?

  Why Does Frozen Trail Update Matter?

  The player-count debate becomes more interesting when looking at what happened earlier in October.

  On October 8, studios released Frozen Trail, a major ARC Raiders update accompanied by a free-play period running from October 8 through October 12.

  The update and promotional period gave both existing players and newcomers reasons to return or try the game.

  The impact was visible in Steam activity.

  On October 7, before the update, ARC Raiders recorded approximately 43,993 peak concurrent players. On October 8, that figure jumped to roughly 130,755.

  The game subsequently reached approximately 185,443 concurrent players on October 11.

  That means ARC Raiders had experienced a substantial surge in activity before PvE test concluded or MW4 DMZ arrived.

  This is a crucial detail because October 18 peak of 159,445 was still far above the levels recorded before Frozen Trail.

  The later decline may therefore reflect several overlapping developments: the end of a free-play promotion, players completing new content, the conclusion of PvE test, ordinary weekday activity patterns, and the arrival of another extraction shooter.

  Notably, the free-play period ended on October 12, while PvE matchmaking experiment continued until October 20. The two events should not be treated as a single promotion.

  A temporary surge followed by declining concurrency is not unusual for a live-service game, particularly after a substantial update or promotional event.

  However, the available figures do not reveal how much of the decline came from each factor.

  The more useful question is whether ARC Raiders can retain the additional audience it attracted during Frozen Trail, rather than whether every player who participated in the October surge remained active afterward.

  Did Ending ARC Raiders PvE Test Cause Players to Leave?

  ARC Raiders PvE matchmaking test ran from October 13 through October 20, giving players a temporary alternative to the game's standard PvPvE experience.

  Instead of entering raids where other players could attack them, participants could select dedicated PvE matchmaking and focus on fighting ARC machines, collecting resources, and surviving environmental threats.

  The experiment introduced several important changes:

  • Player-to-player damage was disabled.
  • Stun and fire throwables could not affect other Raiders.
  • Overall loot value was reduced compared with standard PvPvE sessions.
  • Different squad sizes could encounter one another without the usual squad-separation priority.
  • Major map conditions, including Night Raid, Locked Gate, Hidden Bunker, Frigate, and Redirection, were excluded.

  These restrictions made the test different from simply removing PvP while leaving every other system unchanged.

  Embark had to consider how reduced combat risk might affect equipment acquisition, resource gathering, and the overall extraction experience.

  

  More Than 30 Million PvE Rounds Showed Significant Participation

  On October 20, Embark confirmed that players had completed more than 30 million PvE rounds during the weeklong experiment.

  That is a substantial volume of gameplay data for the studio to analyze.

  However, it does not establish that 30 million different players participated, nor does it reveal what percentage of the player base preferred PvE.

  Embark acknowledged that the experiment had generated polarized reactions and said it would examine both gameplay statistics and player feedback before determining its next steps.

  The studio also began distributing a survey to a representative sample of players on October 22, with additional information expected in November.

  The key issue is whether PvE attracted a distinct audience that would otherwise avoid ARC Raiders' standard extraction format.

  For players who prefer cooperative exploration, PvE removes the possibility of being killed directly by another Raider. That can make resource gathering and encounters with ARC machines feel less confrontational.

  However, it also changes the tension that defines traditional extraction gameplay.

  Players who enjoy negotiating with strangers, anticipating ambushes, or deciding whether another squad can be trusted may find standard PvPvE more engaging.

  Neither preference is inherently more valid.

  Embark's challenge is determining whether the two experiences can coexist without weakening the game's core identity or creating significant progression imbalances.

  Why PvE Test's Ending Cannot Explain Everything?

  The timing matters.

  ARC Raiders' daily peak had already fallen from 159,445 on October 18 to 125,761 on October 19, while PvE test was still running.

  That decline occurred before the scheduled conclusion of the experiment.

  Although players may have anticipated the test ending, the numbers do not support treating the removal of the toggle as the sole explanation.

  The data also cannot distinguish players who stopped playing because PvE ended from those who simply reduced their activity after Frozen Trail.

  What can be established is that PvE experiment attracted considerable participation and gave Embark an important opportunity to evaluate a different approach to extraction gameplay.

  Whether that experiment translates into a permanent mode remains undecided.

  Did MW4 DMZ Early Access Steal ARC Raiders Players?

  Modern Warfare 4 DMZ entered Early Access on October 20, the same day ARC Raiders concluded its PvE test.

  Players who preordered or prepurchased a qualifying digital edition of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 could access DMZ ahead of the full game's October 23 launch.

  The timing created direct competition for extraction shooter players.

  Modern Warfare 4 DMZ introduces a military-focused extraction experience set in Hajin Exclusion Zone, where players can deploy alone or in squads, complete objectives, confront hostile forces and rival Operators, collect valuable equipment, and attempt to extract successfully.

  For players who already enjoy Call of Duty's combat systems, the new DMZ offers a familiar foundation combined with extraction mechanics.

  That makes it reasonable to consider whether some ARC Raiders players temporarily shifted their attention to the new release.

  But there is a difference between a plausible explanation and a demonstrated cause.

  The available Steam figures do not identify which ARC Raiders players also launched MW4 DMZ, how much time they spent in either game, or whether they intend to return.

  Moreover, the decline in ARC Raiders' daily peak began before DMZ Early Access.

  MW4 DMZ may have contributed to competition for players' time, but the evidence does not establish that it caused the reported player drop.

  Why MW4 DMZ Could Still Be a Serious Competitor

  The potential competitive pressure extends beyond launch-week curiosity.

  Modern Warfare 4 DMZ emphasizes structured operations, including Story Missions, Dynamic Operations, Side Ops, and high-value target hunts.

  It also features a Forward Operating Base, or FOB, where players can manage equipment and prepare for future deployments.

  FOB includes inventory storage through Stash, weapon purchasing, and a 3D Printer crafting station.

  Persistent equipment and Operator progression add reasons to continue playing beyond a single successful extraction.

  These features could appeal to players who prefer clearly defined objectives and long-term progression systems.

  However, whether they translate into stronger player retention will depend on how the mode performs beyond its initial release period.

  A major franchise can attract attention quickly. Sustaining that attention is a different challenge.

  

  ARC Raiders vs MW4 DMZ: Which Extraction Shooter Offers More?

  Although both games belong to the extraction shooter genre, they offer distinct gameplay experiences.

  Feature	ARC Raiders	MW4 DMZ
  Setting	Post-apocalyptic science fiction	Modern military conflict
  Perspective	Third-person	First-person
  Primary threats	ARC machines and other Raiders	Hostile factions and rival Operators
  Extraction gameplay	Exploration, scavenging, survival	Missions, tactical combat, extraction
  PvE option	Temporary test ended October 20	PvPvE-focused extraction mode
  Progression	Crafting, equipment preparation, resource gathering	Missions, Operator development, equipment management
  Key appeal	Environmental danger and unpredictable encounters	Familiar military gunplay and structured operations

  What Makes ARC Raiders Different?

  ARC Raiders builds much of its identity around the danger posed by powerful mechanical enemies.

  Players must navigate hazardous environments, manage ammunition and equipment, and decide whether encounters with other Raiders are worth the risk.

  Its third-person perspective, science-fiction atmosphere, and emphasis on scavenging create a different rhythm from Call of Duty.

  The game's PvPvE structure also makes human encounters unpredictable. A nearby player may become an ally, ignore you entirely, or attempt to take your equipment.

  That uncertainty is a central part of the experience.

  For players who enjoy emergent interactions and environmental survival, ARC Raiders offers something that a military-focused extraction shooter cannot simply duplicate.

  What Makes MW4 DMZ Different?

  Modern Warfare 4 DMZ places greater emphasis on military operations and mission-based progression.

  Players enter Hajin to complete objectives, recover resources, and secure equipment for future deployments.

  Forward Operating Base provides a persistent preparation system, while Operator progression offers additional long-term goals.

  This structure may appeal to players who want their extraction sessions organized around specific missions rather than primarily around exploration and scavenging.

  The distinction is important because the two games are not necessarily competing for identical preferences.

  Some players may enjoy both, switching between them depending on whether they want science-fiction survival or military combat.

  The existence of a strong competitor does not automatically mean one game must replace the other.

  How Could PvE and DMZ Competition Affect Items, Loot, and Progression?

  Loot is one of the most important systems connecting ARC Raiders and MW4 DMZ.

  Both games depend on giving players meaningful reasons to enter dangerous environments, collect valuable resources, and attempt successful extractions.

  However, the way each game manages risk can influence how players approach equipment progression.

  ARC Raiders Items and the Risk of PvE Farming

  In ARC Raiders, weapons, crafting materials, equipment, and other resources support preparation for future raids.

  The temporary PvE mode reduced overall loot value compared with standard PvPvE matchmaking.

  That restriction was important because eliminating direct player damage also reduced one of the major risks associated with extracting valuable equipment.

  If PvE offered identical rewards with substantially less danger from other players, it could change how players choose to gather resources.

  Players focused on collecting ARC Raiders items might naturally prefer the lower-risk environment, particularly when farming crafting materials or preparing replacement equipment.

  This creates a balancing challenge for Embark.

  A future permanent PvE option would need reward rules that make cooperative extraction worthwhile without making standard PvPvE progression feel unnecessarily punishing.

  The October test provides information that could help the developer evaluate those trade-offs.

  COD MW4 DMZ Items and Persistent Equipment Progression

  Modern Warfare 4 DMZ also makes equipment management a central part of its extraction loop.

  Players collect weapons, backpacks, resources, and other useful supplies during operations, then attempt to extract with their gear intact.

  The FOB's Stash and crafting facilities support preparation for subsequent deployments.

  This gives MW4 DMZ items practical value beyond individual firefights, since successful extractions can contribute to future mission readiness.

  For players comparing the two games, the important distinction is how equipment progression interacts with combat risk.

  ARC Raiders emphasizes scavenging in a hostile science-fiction environment, while MW4 DMZ connects loot collection with military objectives and Operator preparation.

  Neither approach has been established as having a superior item economy.

  The more relevant question is which system makes successful extraction feel rewarding enough to justify another deployment.

  Will ARC Raiders Bring Back PvE Mode?

  As of October 24, 2026, studios has not confirmed that dedicated PvE matchmaking will become permanent.

  The October 13–20 test has ended, and the game has returned to its standard PvPvE matchmaking structure.

  Embark is reviewing the more than 30 million PvE rounds recorded during the experiment, alongside player feedback and survey responses.

  The studio expects to provide further information in November.

  That follow-up could become an important development for the game because it may clarify whether Embark intends to support players who prefer cooperative extraction without direct PvP combat.

  Until then, players should not assume that ARC Raiders PvE toggle will return unchanged or that the test's participation numbers guarantee a permanent mode.

  Is ARC Raiders Really Losing Players to MW4 DMZ?

  ARC Raiders experienced a significant decline in its Steam daily peak player count between October 18 and October 22, but the available evidence does not establish that Modern Warfare 4 DMZ caused it.

  The timing is certainly notable.

  ARC Raiders ended its PvE matchmaking experiment on October 20, while MW4 DMZ entered Early Access that same day.

  However, the broader October timeline shows that ARC Raiders had already experienced a major activity surge following Frozen Trail and its free-play period.

  The game's daily peak also began declining before DMZ launched, and it recovered slightly on October 23.

  These details suggest a more complicated situation than a straightforward story of one extraction shooter stealing another's audience.

  For Embark, the immediate challenge is understanding whether the PvE experiment attracted players who are unlikely to remain engaged with standard PvPvE matchmaking.

  For Modern Warfare 4 DMZ, the challenge is converting launch-week interest into sustained activity through missions, progression, and future content.

  Both games have distinct strengths, and their competition may ultimately benefit players by encouraging continued improvements.

  For now, ARC Raiders has experienced a measurable decline from its October peak, but there is no verified evidence that MW4 DMZ is responsible for that decline.

  The next meaningful indicators will be ARC Raiders' longer-term player trends, Embark's November PvE follow-up, and whether MW4 DMZ maintains its initial momentum.

• ARC Raiders PvE Test Ends After 30 Million Rounds: What Happens Next?

  ARC Raiders’ limited-time PvE matchmaking test has ended, but the debate over a permanent PvE mode is far from over. Embark Studios confirmed on October 20, 2026, that players completed more than 30 million PvE rounds during the experiment. The studio says it needs time to analyze gameplay data and community feedback, with further information expected in November.

  For players wondering whether ARC Raiders PvE is coming back, the answer is not yet confirmed. The temporary matchmaking option has been removed, and Embark has not announced a permanent PvE mode or a return date.

  The test has nevertheless raised an important question for the extraction shooter: can ARC Raiders support players who enjoy exploration, looting, and cooperative missions without losing the tension that makes its PvPvE encounters exciting?

  

  ARC Raiders PvE Status: Is the Mode Still Available?

  No. The limited-time PvE matchmaking toggle ran from October 13 to October 20, 2026. The test allowed players to choose between the standard player-versus-player-versus-environment experience and a PvE-focused alternative.

  With the test over, matchmaking has returned to its normal PvPvE format. Players cannot currently select the experimental PvE option through the removed toggle.

  Embark has confirmed that it expects to share further information in November. That is a planned communication window, not a confirmed release date for a permanent mode.

  The distinction matters. The studio has demonstrated that it is willing to test a separate PvE experience, but it has not promised to make that experience a permanent feature.

  For players who enjoyed the quieter sessions, the next meaningful milestone is Embark’s analysis of the test—not an assumed launch date.

  Why Embark Tested PvE for “Dad Gamers” and Casual Players

  ARC Raiders was built around extraction gameplay, where players enter a dangerous environment, gather valuable ARC Raiders items, complete objectives, and attempt to escape with their loot. The threat comes from both hostile ARC machines and other human players.

  That combination creates tension, but it also creates friction for players who want a more predictable cooperative experience.

  A player might enter a raid to finish a quest, collect crafting materials, explore an unfamiliar area, or make progress during a short gaming session. An unexpected player encounter can interrupt that plan, especially when losing a fight means losing valuable equipment.

  This is where the “Dad Gamers” discussion comes in. The phrase describes a recognizable audience of players who may have limited gaming time and prefer to make steady progress without constantly preparing for hostile encounters. It is a useful shorthand for a playstyle, not a formal category that represents every older player or parent.

  A PvE option could give these players more control over the kind of session they want. Someone could focus on scavenging and quests in a cooperative environment, then return to standard PvPvE when they want the additional risk.

  Embark’s September announcement explained that the original concept for ARC Raiders had been a cooperative PvE looting game before the project evolved into the PvPvE extraction adventure released today.

  That history makes the experiment particularly interesting. The studio is not simply adding a completely unrelated mode; it is revisiting an aspect of the game's earlier design while trying to preserve the identity of the current release.

  What Happened During the ARC Raiders PvE Test?

  The experimental mode changed several rules to reduce direct conflict between players.

  Player-versus-player damage was disabled

  PvE sessions had zero player-to-player damage. Throwables, including stun and fire items, could not be used to damage other players. Other physical interactions, such as barricades and ziplines, remained unaffected.

  This made it possible to concentrate on cooperative exploration without the usual risk of being attacked by another Raider.

  However, the mode was not designed to remove every danger from the world.

  ARC enemies remained dangerous

  Hostile ARC machines continued to threaten players. Embark also warned that ARC enemies could reacquire downed players after an eight-second grace period if those players moved.

  That distinction is central to understanding the experiment: PvE removed direct player combat, not the game's environmental and AI-driven challenges.

  Loot values were reduced

  Embark lowered overall loot value in PvE sessions to account for the relative safety of collecting items without hostile players.

  This was an important economic safeguard. If players could consistently gather valuable loot with substantially less risk, the balance between the two matchmaking experiences could change.

  The studio also said different squad sizes would encounter one another more often, rather than prioritizing separation. Certain major map conditions—including Night Raid, Locked Gate, Hidden Bunker, Frigate, and Redirection—were excluded from the test.

  These restrictions show that the experimental mode was a controlled alternative, not simply the standard game with enemy players switched off.

  What Do More Than 30 Million PvE Rounds Tell Us?

  The headline figure is substantial: Embark reported more than 30 million PvE rounds played over the testing period.

  It confirms that the experiment generated a large volume of gameplay data for the developers to study. It also gives the studio an opportunity to compare the PvE experience with standard PvPvE sessions and review player feedback.

  However, the number needs to be interpreted carefully.

  Thirty million rounds does not mean 30 million individual players. A single player can participate in multiple rounds, so the figure measures gameplay sessions rather than unique users.

  It also does not establish that every participant wants permanent PvE, that PvE is more popular than PvPvE, or that the experimental rules would work unchanged in the long term.

  Embark itself described the test as polarizing in its October 20 update. The studio said it needed time to analyze the data and collect players’ thoughts before deciding how to proceed.

  The most useful conclusions will depend on more than participation volume. Developers will need to understand how players behaved, whether the different matchmaking options affected each other, and whether the resulting experiences support the long-term health of the game.

  In other words, the 30 million rounds are evidence of a large experiment—not a final verdict on the future of ARC Raiders.

  Why Do Some Players Say ARC Raiders Feels Worse Without PvE?

  The disagreement over PvE is really a disagreement about what makes an extraction shooter enjoyable.

  For players who favor cooperative exploration, the appeal is straightforward. They can focus on objectives, search for resources, learn maps, and coordinate with teammates without constantly anticipating an attack from another player.

  That does not necessarily mean they want an easy game. ARC machines, limited resources, extraction decisions, and the consequences of getting downed can still create meaningful pressure.

  For players who prefer the traditional PvPvE format, however, uncertainty is part of the attraction.

  An encounter with another Raider can change an entire raid. A seemingly peaceful interaction might become a fight, while an unexpected alliance can turn a dangerous situation into a successful extraction. The possibility of conflict gives equipment, positioning, sound cues, and decisions about when to leave additional weight.

  Removing hostile player encounters changes those decisions.

  If a player no longer needs to watch for other Raiders, certain routes may feel safer, loot collection may become more predictable, and encounters with ARC machines may carry a different emotional weight.

  This helps explain why some players may enjoy PvE while others feel it removes an essential part of the experience. Neither reaction proves that one audience is right. They reflect different expectations of what an extraction shooter should deliver.

  The more difficult question for Embark is whether these audiences can coexist without undermining the core experience.

  Could a Permanent PvE Mode Change the ARC Raiders Loot Economy?

  Potentially, yes. This is one of the most important design challenges behind a permanent PvE option.

  In extraction games, risk and reward are closely connected. Valuable loot is meaningful partly because acquiring it can expose a player to danger, and successfully extracting with that loot represents progress earned under pressure.

  If a safer matchmaking option offers the same economic rewards with fewer threats, players may have a strong incentive to favor it. Over time, that could affect the value of different activities and the way players approach progression.

  Embark’s test addressed this concern by reducing overall loot value in PvE sessions. Its September explanation also discussed the broader economy and the possibility that PvE matchmaking could affect the quality of standard PvPvE sessions.

  A permanent implementation would require careful decisions about loot values, progression, matchmaking populations, queue times, and how the two experiences interact.

  The studio could retain separate reward rules, revise the balance of PvE activities, or redesign parts of the system. These are possible approaches, not confirmed plans.

  The key challenge is to make PvE worthwhile without making the higher-risk PvPvE experience feel like an inferior way to progress.

  ARC Raiders Items: What About Assorted Seeds?

  Assorted Seeds is an item-related search term that fits the broader interest in scavenging, resource collection, and inventory management in ARC Raiders.

  For players who focus on gathering materials, understanding an item's role in the game's economy is useful. But item information should be separated from speculation about the PvE test.

  Embark's published test rules confirmed that overall loot value was reduced in PvE sessions. They did not establish that Assorted Seeds received a specific change to its value, drop rate, or availability.

  Players should therefore avoid assuming that the experimental mode changed the item's underlying properties.

  For an item-specific decision—whether to keep, recycle, trade, or prioritize an item—consult current in-game information and a reliable, up-to-date item reference. Those details can change independently of matchmaking experiments.

  The broader lesson is that a safer scavenging environment can change how players perceive risk and rewards, even when there is no confirmed change to an individual item's statistics.

  When Will ARC Raiders PvE Return?

  Embark expects to provide further information in November 2026, following its analysis of gameplay data and player feedback.

  As of October 24, the studio has not confirmed that a permanent PvE mode will be released. It has also not announced a specific date when the experimental toggle will return.

  There are several possible outcomes. Embark could decide to develop a permanent option, revise the concept and test it again, or conclude that a dedicated PvE toggle does not support the game's long-term goals.

  The studio has explicitly cautioned that the test was not a promise of a future PvE mode. Any eventual version could also differ substantially from the October experiment.

  For players hoping to see the feature return, November's update should provide a clearer indication of what the developers learned and whether they intend to pursue another iteration.

  Until then, claims that PvE is definitely returning—or that it has been permanently cancelled—go beyond what the studio has confirmed.

  Frequently Asked Questions

  Is ARC Raiders PvE mode gone?

  The limited-time PvE matchmaking test ended on October 20, 2026. The experimental toggle is no longer available, and standard PvPvE matchmaking has resumed.

  Will ARC Raiders get a permanent PvE mode?

  It remains undecided. Embark has said the test will inform its future plans, but the studio has not promised a permanent PvE mode.

  When will Embark announce the future of ARC Raiders PvE?

  The developer expects to share further information in November 2026. This is an expected update window, not a confirmed date for a mode release.

  How many rounds were played during the PvE test?

  Embark reported more than 30 million PvE rounds during the October 13–20 testing period. This figure represents rounds played, not unique players.

  Was PvE easier than standard PvPvE?

  PvE removed direct player-to-player damage, making hostile encounters with other Raiders less of a concern. However, ARC enemies remained dangerous, and loot values were reduced to account for the relative safety of the mode.

  Whether the experience felt easier overall depended on a player's priorities and playstyle.

  Will a permanent PvE mode affect loot and progression?

  It could. A safer way to collect loot may change the relationship between risk and reward. Embark reduced overall loot value during the test, but it has not announced the economic rules for any future mode.

  Did the PvE test change Assorted Seeds?

  The official test rules do not establish a specific change to Assorted Seeds' value or drop rate. Players should check current item information rather than assume that the experiment changed its properties.

  The Bigger Question: Can ARC Raiders Support Two Different Playstyles?

  The October PvE experiment has given Embark a substantial amount of information to evaluate, but the number of rounds played is only one part of the story.

  The real challenge is balancing two different reasons people play ARC Raiders. Some players want the uncertainty of human opponents, the possibility of betrayal, and the high stakes of extracting with valuable gear. Others want the freedom to explore, complete objectives, and cooperate without another player turning every encounter into a potential fight.

  A well-designed PvE option could broaden the game's appeal. A poorly balanced one could weaken the tension, economy, or matchmaking experience that existing players value.

  The answer will depend on the data, the quality of player feedback, and the design choices Embark makes next.

  For now, the confirmed facts are straightforward: the limited-time test has ended, more than 30 million PvE rounds were played, and the studio expects to share further information in November.

  ARC Raiders PvE is not confirmed to be returning—but the discussion about its future is still open.

• Will ARC Raiders Bring Back PvE Mode? Devs Weigh Player Data and Game Balance

  After the limited-time PvE test for ARC Raiders ended, the most pressing question for players shifted from the test experience to whether this mode would be implemented. The studio released an initial statement confirming that more time is needed to analyze player feedback and game data, and plans to provide further information in November.

  Meanwhile, Store Update 2.2.0 has also been released, adjusting the enemy spawn mechanism and combat performance in ARC. These changes are also worth noting for players still engaging in regular raids.

  The follow-up arrangements for PvE test and the actual changes in Store Update 2.2.0 will jointly influence the future gameplay experience of ARC Raiders.

  PvE Test Ends: Over 30 Million Matches

  

  The limited-time PvE matchmaking toggle test for ARC Raiders accumulated over 30 million matches, with a peak concurrent player count of 185,443 on Steam alone. This translates to approximately 4.28 million matches per day, an extremely high level of participation for a limited-time test with only a one-week window.

  However, with the test's end, the number of concurrent players dropped significantly. The Steam peak on the last full day of PvE test was approximately 126,000 players, falling to approximately 87,500 the following day, a drop of about 30% in a single day. This indicates that a considerable number of players chose to temporarily leave after PvE ended, rather than returning to regular PvPvE.

  Even with such strong data indicating a player preference for PvE, the official team did not immediately announce whether to retain the mode, stating instead that they needed time to analyze the data and collect feedback.

  They stated they were particularly interested in understanding two aspects: how PvE mode differs from regular matches, and whether the experience of regular PvPvE matches changed during testing.

  This arrangement indicates that the development team is evaluating not only the popularity of PvE but also its impact on the overall matchmaking environment, player retention, and gameplay experience.

  The Future of PvE Mode: Player Needs and Game Balance

  

  The core appeal of PvE mode lies in allowing players to focus on exploring the map, gathering resources, fighting ARC enemies, and cooperating with other Raiders, without constantly being on guard against attacks from other players. This provides ARC Raiders with an experience different from traditional PvPvE.

  However, launching a standalone PvE mode is not simply about shutting down player-to-player damage mechanics. For the studio, the key is how to meet the needs of cooperative players while avoiding undermining the balance of the existing PvPvE ecosystem.

  To this end, the development team needs to evaluate not only the performance of PvE itself but also its impact on regular matches.

  During the testing phase, the developers reduced loot rewards in PvE matches and slightly increased base loot levels in regular matches, attempting to minimize the impact of the mode switch on the game economy and player distribution.

  Player team composition is also a factor to consider. Compared to solo players, duo and trio teams are more likely to encounter opposing players in regular PvPvE matches.

  The standalone PvE mode can provide a more stable cooperative environment for players who want to explore and complete missions with friends. However, the addition of this mode may also divert players, affecting matchmaking efficiency and the overall experience of regular matches.

  Therefore, the ultimate fate of PvE cannot be determined solely by the number of participants during the testing phase or short-term feedback. Analyzing player dwell time in the mode, willingness to replay, and continued activity after the test is essential.

  If PvE returns, what adjustments are needed?

  If PvE mode returns, the development team needs to focus on addressing two key issues: reducing malicious interference between players and increasing the challenge.

  PvP Conflict Persists

  While the PvE test provided a more relaxed, cooperative environment, disabling player-versus-player damage didn't eliminate all conflict. Players can still use Bull Rush to knock others off heights, block passageways, or steal loot after other players have killed ARC enemies.

  These issues demonstrate that even without direct player combat, resource contention and malicious interference can still undermine the cooperative experience.

  If PvE is tested again in the future, the development team could consider improving the loot distribution mechanism, such as giving contributors a more equitable loot priority or adjusting drop rules for specific combat scenarios.

  Lack of Challenge to Ensure Long-Term Appeal

  Another issue is challenge. With the removal of player threats, ARC enemies will become the primary source of danger in matches. If there aren't enough enemies and the combat mechanics lack variation, PvE may quickly lose its appeal.

  However, the developers have previously stated that the number of ARCs the server can handle is limited by resource budget. Therefore, increasing the number of enemies may not be a viable solution for ARC Raiders.

  With a limited number of enemies, a more reasonable approach might be to increase the strength of some ARC enemies, adjust environmental conditions, or design special battles that require players to cooperate.

  For example, more challenging large-scale ARC battles, multiplayer cooperative objectives, and missions requiring squad division of labor could all increase the motivation for sustained PvE gameplay.

  Store Update 2.2.0: Adjustments to Enemy Spawn and Combat Mechanics

  

  Store Update 2.2.0 was released simultaneously after PvE testing phase, primarily adjusting ARC enemy spawn mechanism, combat behavior, and some mission and movement mechanics, while also adding Wreck Sets.

  The changes to ARC Turbine spawn location are particularly noteworthy in this update. In Buried City, Riven Tides, Blue Gate, and Spaceport, ARC Turbines will now spawn in the vast majority of matches.

  However, this objective no longer appears in normal matches and most map conditions in Dam Battlegrounds. Players looking for ARC Turbines should prioritize the other four map conditions.

  For players still engaged in regular raids, understanding the spawn patterns of ARC Turbines can help optimize looting routes and improve resource acquisition efficiency. If you want to acquire gear faster, you can also buy ARC Raiders items to facilitate your next extraction.

  In terms of combat, Hydra's attacks are now more effectively distributed across multiple targets, with increased base damage and more effective melee attacks. Furthermore, some issues with ARC's hit rate against sliding players have been fixed, and players using the Gondola Transceiver will now trigger ARC's attention.

  Movement and quest mechanics have also been optimized. Grappling Hook rappelling, auto-vaulting, and rope climbing are smoother, the Tether Launcher can now be repaired in-game, and To the Skies quest can now be completed on any map.

  November will be a crucial month for observation

  Overall, the ARC Raiders PvE testing has demonstrated a significant player demand for cooperative gameplay. For players hoping for a PvE return, the most important thing now is to keep an eye on official announcements in November, including whether a second round of testing, gameplay adjustments, or a full release plan will be announced.

  If the development team can further improve loot distribution, add cooperative objectives, and resolve malicious interference issues, PvE has the potential to evolve from a limited-time test into a more complete gaming experience.

  Meanwhile, Store Update 2.2.0 has already brought several useful adjustments to regular raids. Players can adjust their loot routes based on changes to ARC Turbine spawns and keep an eye out for changes to Hydra, Grappling Hooks, and quest mechanics. Until the final destination of PvE is announced, these updates remain an important part of the current gaming experience.